在离婚案件中,如何解决低于50万澳元的财产纠纷? 什么是PPP500?| 澳法评
1061
Falv.com.au
感谢阅读
第1061篇文章
家庭法第80篇文章 | 婚姻资产
作者:Luna Zhou
单位:Auslaw Partners | 澳和律业
字数:3181字
预计阅读时间:7分钟
☟欢迎添加作者微信,点击文末“在看”☟
鼓励作者们致力于澳洲华人社区的公益普法
澳洲法律评论 | Auslaw Review
免费法律咨询,扫码获得24/7
领先澳洲华人律师团队的法律建议
在澳洲很多离婚案件中,经常会出现夫妻双方并没有很多共同财产的情况。举例来说,若夫妻双方的共有资产大约为40万澳元,包括一辆车和存款。在正在进行财产分割的诉讼中,双方要付的所有诉讼相关费用加起来可能会到5万澳元甚至更多。这些费用主要包括律师费用,法院费用,以及财产价值评估等等。并且整个诉讼程序可能需要耗时半年以上。
壹
什么是PPP500?
为了更加有效率和节省分割财产的费用,澳洲也有类似于中国小额诉讼程序的制度,即Priority Property Pools under $500,000 cases(缩写为PPP500,即财产池低于$500,000案件)。从2020年3月1日起,澳大利亚联邦巡回法院(the Federal Circuit Court of Australia)在阿德莱德,布里斯班,墨尔本和帕拉马塔进行PPP500案件试点。
PPP500 案件的依据是1975 年《家庭法》(Cth)第 79 条或第 90SM 条《家庭法》(可能适用)。PPP500 案件试点旨在通过提供一种解决财产纠纷的简化方式,对弱势当事人进行保护。通过将风险和法律成本降至最低的方法,最好的保护当事人的资产。
什么是PPP500?
贰
PPP500适用范围
(1) 双方的净资产(包括退休金权益)少于$500,000或很可能少于$ 500,000 ;并且
(2) 没有任何一方拥有或有效控制可能需要估值或专家调查的实体(例如家族信托、公司或自我管理的养老基金);并且
(3) 诉讼中的任何一方均不寻求以下命令(orders):
a. 根据《家庭法》第七部分的养育(parenting)或任何其他命令;或
b. 根据 1989 年儿童抚养费(评估)法和/或 1988 年儿童抚养费(登记和收款)法;或
c. 通过强制执行抚养义务或抚养费义务的命令。
叁
PPP500申请诉讼程序
(1) 可以通过填写和提交Initiation Application(申请表)和PPP500 Financial Summary Form (财产摘要)来启动PPP500诉讼程序。
(2) 登记官(Registrars)会审查所有提交的申请,并在第一个开庭日期之前在作出命令(orders)来处理PPP500案件。
英
文
版
In many divorce cases in Australia, it often happens that both spouses do not have a lot of joint property. For example, if the parties’ joint assets are approximately A$400,000, including a car and deposits. However, if the two parties are in a lawsuit over the division of property, then all litigation-related costs that both parties have to pay may up to A$50,000 or more. These expenses mainly include solicitor’s and barrister’s fees, court fees, and property valuation fees, etc. And the entire litigation process may take more than half a year.
No.
01
What is PPP500?
In order to be more efficient and save the cost of dividing property, Australia also has a system similar to China's small claims procedure. Priority Property Pools under $500,000 cases (PPP500) is an application for alteration of property interests pursuant to section 79 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (Family Law Act) or section 90SM Family Law Act (as may apply) filed after 1 March 2020 in the Pilot location. The Pilot operates in the following registries of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia: Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne and Parramatta.
No.
02
PPP500’s scope of application
(1) the net property of the parties (including superannuation interests) is, or is likely to be, $500,000 or less, and
(2) there are no entities (such as a family trust, company, or self-managed superannuation fund) owned or in the effective control of either party that might require valuation or expert investigation, and
(3) neither party in the proceedings seeks orders:
a. for parenting or any other order pursuant to Part VII of the Family Law Act
b. pursuant to the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 and/or the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 , or
c. by way of an enforcement of an order or obligation whether a parenting or financial obligation.
推广
(扫码关注LawTalk免费直播讲座
@单周每周四澳洲东部时间17点)
推广
No.
03
Commencing proceedings
(1) Proceedings can be commenced in a PPP500 matter with the filing of an Initiating Application and a PPP500 Financial Summary (form).
(2) Registrars review all property only applications filed in order to provide early identification of PPP500 matters and make orders in chambers to progress the matter prior to the first court date.
Resources from:
Information about Priority Property Pools under $500,000 cases
http://www.federalcircuitcourt.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/fccweb/family-law-matters/property-and-finance/ppp500/ppp500-info
本文作者:Luna
● 云南财经大学YNUFE,法学学士学位(校级优秀毕业生),经济法方向
● 云南财经大学YNUFE,民商法学术硕士学位,知识产权方向
●西澳大学UWA CELT,Bridging Course 优秀毕业生
●邦德大学Bond University, Juris Doctor 法律执业博士在读
● 澳和律业Auslaw Partners 律政新人王实习项目-律师助理
感谢阅读
点击最下方“阅读原文”,可查看产权法专栏精彩内容。
喜欢我们的读者朋友们也可以向后台发送你所感兴趣的内容,也许下一期文章就是你想知道的哦!
声明:
本平台原创内容未经授权禁止转载,转载、作者供稿或商业合作请点击公众号菜单栏中的咨询合作。
本文仅供一般性参考,并无意提供任何个案法律建议,内容受作者本人原创保护,且作者与专栏平台明示不对任何依赖本文任何内容而采取或不采取行动所导致的后果承担责任。
关于此文的更多问题,欢迎联系小编微信(Auslawreview01)获得澳洲(昆士兰州)领先华人律师团队的法律建议。
性侵、勒索、诽谤,如果吴某凡事件发生在澳洲会怎样?| 澳洲强奸罪
掌掴踹飞讨薪华女,阿德奶茶店打人男下周宣判!“非常羞愧且后悔”!| 澳法评
从58万的天价薯条来解析澳洲生意买卖与风险管理 | 律动讲座81